What must an accomplice's testimony be corroborated with?

The requirement for an accomplice's testimony to be corroborated with other evidence connecting the defendant to the offense is rooted in the legal principle that accomplices may have motivations to lie or exaggerate their statements, especially if they are trying to reduce their own culpability. Therefore, it is essential for the integrity of the judicial process that any claims made by an accomplice are supported by independent evidence that links the accused to the crime in question. This helps ensure that a conviction is based on a well-rounded view of the facts rather than solely on potentially unreliable testimony.

Corroborating evidence can include things like forensic evidence, witness accounts independent of the accomplice, or other documentation that links the defendant to the crime. This requirement aims to prevent wrongful convictions based on unverified statements and supports a fair trial for the accused.